Project work XI- Responses from employers of passed out trainees

Responses from employers of passed out trainees

The effectiveness of any training programme cannot be completed without knowing how the passed out trainees are performing in their respective organizations. The MLM student sent the questionnaire to the ten (10) organizations where the passed out trainees of the Apollo Medskills skill development centre, moosarambagh, Hyderabad are working. The questionnaire was prepared for employer to get the feedback of the Passed out trainees (now employee) of the training centre.  There are six parameters in the questionnaire. These parameters are - Quality of work, quantity of work, Adaptability, Job Knowledge, Dependability and Attitude. Each parameter has been given four options. The employers were requested to fill the options of each parameter for employees (the passed out trainees of training centre). Out of ten, four organizations participated in the study. These four organizations are Canadian Global life and Educare Pvt. Ltd., Optival health solution private Ltd., Rainbow children’s Medicare Private Ltd and Life circle Health Service private Ltd. There are twenty-two (22) passed out trainees are working in Canadian Global life and Educare Pvt. Their average working period is six months and average salary is Rs 10,000. The optival Health solution Private Ltd. has thirty-one (31) employees who are passed out from Apollo Medskills training centre. The average working period of trainees is six months and average salary is Rs 9000. There are twenty-five (25) passed out trainees working in Rainbow children’s Medicare Private Ltd. The average working period of employees is six months to one year and average salary is Rs 8000. Twenty-two (22) passed out trainees are working in Life circle Health Service private Ltd. Their average working period is twenty months and average salary is Rs 12,000-14,000.

The analysis of employees is prepared based on six parameters mentioned above. The analysis is done and presented in tabular form and bar chart.

Quality of work

Particulars	No. of trained employees	Percentage (%)
Unsatisfactory	03	03
Usually accepted /satisfactory	13	13
Consistently satisfactory	58	58
Superior/ Consistently Superior	26	26
Total	100	100

Table 4.44-  Employers feedback on employee trained by Apollo Medskills on Quality of workIn quality of work, employers find three (3%) employees  unsatisfactory, thirteen (13%) employees usually expected/ satisfactory, Fifty-eight (58%) employees consistently satisfactory and twenty-six (26%) employee superior / consistently superior.

Quantity of work

Particulars	No. of trained employees	Percentage (%)
Below Average	06	06
Average	37	37
Above Average	39	39
Exceptionally high	18	18
Total	100	100

Table 4.45-  Employers feedback on employee trained by Apollo Medskills on Quantity of work 
In quantity of work parameter, employers find performance of six (6%) employees (Trained from Apollo Medskills) below average in the organization.  Employers find Thirty-seven (37%) employees average, thirty-nine (39%) above average and eighteen (18%) exceptionally high in performance in terms of quantity of work. 

Graph 4.30 - Employers feedback on employee trained by Apollo Medskills on Quantity of work.

   Adaptability

Particulars	No. of trained employees	Percentage (%)
Learn slowly, required repeated instruction	10	10
Detailed instruction required for change	26	26
Adjustment made with little trouble	34	34
Learn very quickly, changes met easily	30	30
Total	100	100

Table 4.46 – Employers feedback on employees trained by Apollo   Medskills on Adaptability
Employers observed that ten (10%) employees learn slowly, required repeated instruction , twenty-six (26%)  require detailed instruction for any change , thirty-four (34%) employees make adjustment with little trouble and thirty (30%) employees  learn quickly and any changes met easily .

Job Knowledge 

Particulars	No. of trained employees	Percentage (%)
Little desire to improve	14	14
Know job very well, require average supervision	34	34
Well informed on job, rarely need help	28	28
Make most use of knowledge and experience	24	24
Total	100	100

Table 4.47- Employers feedback on employees trained by Apollo Medskills on Job knowledge parameter.

Employers observed that  fourteen (14%) employee have little desire to improve , thirty-four (34%) employees know job very well and require average supervision , twenty-eight (28%) employees are well informed on job, rarely need help and twenty-four (24%) make most use of knowledge and experience .

Dependability  

Particulars	No. of trained employees	Percentage (%)
Require frequent checking or watching	25	25
Generally require check up on job	33	33
Does task faithfully, need some follow up	28	28
Marked ability to follow any fair job	14	14
Total	100	100

Table 4.48 – Employers feedback on Employees trained by Apollo Medskills on Dependability Parameter

In dependability parameter, Employers observed that twenty-five (25%) employees require frequent checking or watching, thirty-three (33%) employees generally require check up on job, twenty-eight (28%) employees do task faithfully , need some follow up and  fourteen (14%) employees have marked ability to follow any fair job.

Attitude

Particulars	No. of trained employees	Percentage (%)
Cooperate if required to do so , disgruntled	19	19
Reacts to change with some reluctant	33	33
Usually willing to cooperate with others	30	30
Exceptionally good team worker, cooperative	18	18
Total	100	100

Table 4.49- Employers feedback on Employees trained by Apollo Medskills on Attitude Parameter
In attitude parameter, Employers observed that nineteen (19%) employees cooperate if required to do , disgruntled , thirty-three (33%)  employees react to change with some reluctant , thirty (30%) employees usually willing to cooperate with others and eighteen (18%) employees are exceptionally good team workers , cooperative.